Return to Me is a pretty simple movie without all the bells and whistles of big blockbusters, but instead has all the trimmings and trappings of rom-coms. I can hear WLC groaning even as I type this, but it was actually a pretty fun and likable movie, one that didn’t fall into the normal pitfalls rom-coms can fall into. WLC and DW are working on a theory that romantic comedies are responsible for this country’s astronomical divorce rate, for a variety of reasons. I agree with their reasoning for the most part, but Return to Me is unique among its stock. It doesn’t have any of the malignant tendencies that Serendipity, Forces of Nature, or Sleepless in Seattle have in spades, being that if you are unhappy at all in your relationship, it’s because you’re with the wrong person, and you should be with your “true love”. In Return to Me, the main character actually gets to be with his true love twice.
Bob Rueland (David Duchovny) is a mild-mannered and happy architect, with a lovely wife named Elizabeth (Joely Richardson) who works with gorillas at the local zoo, teaching one of them sign language. The night of a banquet where they announce the building of a new wing of the zoo, there is a car accident, and
Things get very interesting when the characters learn that when
The movie itself is a little over-done, and will no doubt induce the girly-girls to reach for the tissue box, and make manly-men gag on their pork rinds. But writer/director/supporting cast member Bonnie Hunt appears to know her way around a good romantic comedy, despite that this is her first film. I call this a good romantic comedy because it contains none of what I consider to be the two biggest killers of rom-coms: the protagonist ditching their fiancé to be with their “true love,” and the central couple lying to each other for no reason. Return to Me deftly avoids those pit traps.
The rest of the movie is okay, but what makes it worth it is the ridiculously endearing supporting cast, especially the four Italian/Irish old men discussing the singing and acting chops of the Rat Pack. But in general, Return to Me is just a harmless, inoffensive and safe movie that will not push you in any way, though it may make you see love in a slightly different light. It really connects with me, as does the character of Grace, because of the transplant thing. But it wasn’t an earth-shaking movie for me, even having that connection, so I imagine it won’t be for you.
“Pray in
“Elizabeth and I were married by the time we were twenty, and we'd been going out since we were fifteen, so this may sound a bit juvenile, but... can I hold your hand?”
“All the times I prayed that Gracie would have a second chance at life, I always knew that if God blessed us, the heart she got would have to be from a very special person, if it were going to be at home in Grace. When she met you, her heart beat truly for the first time. Perhaps it was meant to be with you always.”
Particle Man
5 comments:
First of all, Particle Man, let me say: Nice review.
Secondly, I definitely appreciate the shout-out to the theory that WLC and I are working on.
And while Return to Me does avoid some of the more egregious rom-com issues, it's not blameless. You very adeptly state the problem with most romcoms: "if you are unhappy at all in your relationship, it’s because you’re with the wrong person, and you should be with your 'true love.'" I wholeheartedly agree.
But then you move on to say: "In Return to Me, the main character actually gets to be with his true love twice." But the concept of "one true love" is what causes the problem to begin with. Without intending to, it can place all the emphasis on relationship selection and take focus off of relationship maintenance. Since it's your true love that makes you happy (the faulty logic goes), if you're not happy then you're not with your true love.
Now, as you mentioned, Return to Me does avoid the unhappiness-equals-improper-mate part of the equation, but, as I've pointed out, the only-one-true-love motif is essentially the same point. And Return to Me also subtly sends an unhappy message to widows and widowers, namely: If your true love has passed on, you had better hope he or she left a part of themselves to someone else, or you'll never feel true love again.
your point is valid, DW, but i think you are being overly pessimistic, and not giving the movie enough credit. you're choosing to get a really negative message out of the movie (the widower thing), when i'm sure that's not the message the movie meant to convey. while it's true that the "one true love" thing is massively egregious, i get the feeling that this movie promoted that idea without really meaning to.
Hey, I liked this movie!
I don't know if I agree that it didn't commit the typical rom com crimes--I remember thinking when I saw it that it had the standard amount of sap, but I did appreciate the reality of the lives of the characters.
I have not seen this movie, but I would have to say that I agree with Dr. Worm on his point about the one true love. Who says you only get one, the god of chick flicks?
Yes, the god of chick flicks, who was Nora Ephron, the last time I checked.
Post a Comment